Which of the following accurately pairs the timing requirements for subsequent permanency hearings?

• A. Commence within 3 months; complete within 60 days
• B. Commence within 9 months; complete within 15 days
• C. Commence within 6 months; complete within 30 days
• D. Commence within 12 months; complete within 90 days

Answer: (C)

The timing for subsequent permanency hearings is structured to keep the case moving at a steady, predictable pace while ensuring prompt resolution. The correct approach is to commence the hearing within six months of the prior hearing, and to complete the process within 30 days. Starting within six months ensures a timely follow-up review of the child’s permanency plan, preventing drift between hearings. Completing within 30 days keeps the hearing itself and the resulting decision from delaying any longer, so the family and case plan can move forward without unnecessary holdups. The other options either push the start too early or too late or pair unlikely combinations of timeframes, which would disrupt the regular cadence of permanency reviews.